"Sure," you might say, "it's easy to say that Thomas was a good example, but he had empirical evidence of Jesus. What am I supposed to do?"
Good question. How are we supposed to believe, or more to the point, how are we supposed to overcome doubt without evidence?
Our cultural fear of doubt is one side of the coin, the other is our desire for empirical evidence. We want to know for sure. We'll be convinced by statistics, studies, proof, hard evidence. Marketing, politics, academics, warfare, and religion are all now supposed to be based on hard data. We can target this demographic and have a 78% chance of success. We can make this product and have just a 5.5% chance that it will hurt anyone. We can attack that country and have a 35% chance of achieving our goals. We can calculate the statistical probability that God exists at 67%.
But none of that is evidence. None of that is the same at touching the resurrected Jesus.
So, how can I doubt like Thomas did? How can I be expected to believe the same way that the apostles did?
You might be saying now, "If God really wanted me to believe in him, he'd give me proof. Since I have no proof, he must not exist."
You bring up a good point. What would you say to you?
No comments:
Post a Comment